Millions of signals.Every second.This isn't a dashboard.
Which assets are failing. Where energy is bleeding. What breaks next. The answers are already in your buildings — buried in noise, scattered across systems, half of it wrong. BeconixAI validates the data, diagnoses the fault, and carries it to a closed job with the evidence attached.
Built for one industry, not adapted to it.
We chose one industry and made ourselves responsible for the whole chain: reading the controller on the wall, working out what the data means, and closing the work order at the far end. That is a narrower business than a general-purpose data platform, and deliberately so — your estate does not arrive here as a modelling exercise somebody still has to do.
We are not a software company
Plant, panels and meters are the work we come from. It shows — the platform already knows what a VAV box is, and which variables belong in an energy baseline (domain experience built in: the equipment types and the baseline drivers come from having surveyed, integrated and commissioned that plant ourselves).
Deliberately narrow
Buildings, sites and the work that keeps them running. Not CRM, not ERP. A platform stretched across every industry is shallow in all of them, and this one has to be right about a compressor.
One accountable party
Survey, instrument, integrate, commission, run. Not a licence and a list of partners at exactly the point it gets difficult, which is often the panel nobody on site can read.
Open at the integration layer
Two gateways, because the two jobs are not the same. For building systems, meters and controllers, the IoT Edge gateway runs Tridium Niagara — an open industry standard, so any competent integrator can work on it, including one that is not us. For fire, a purpose-built gateway reads the panel listen-only and never writes back, leaving the certified system exactly as commissioned. Neither is a box that only one supplier can service.
No margin in the middle
One platform instead of two, and no integrator sitting between you and the people who built it. You pay for the product and the delivery, not for the layer that joins two others together.
Local wherever it runs
Currency, tariff, carbon factor, timezone and the working week are configuration, not assumptions in the code — including a Friday to Saturday weekend. English, Arabic and Russian. Cloud, private cloud, or fully in-country.
Data everywhere. Almost none of it in use.
The equipment is installed. The fire panel is certified and doing its job. Somewhere there is a meter. The answers are in there — buried in noise, scattered across systems, and half of it wrong — and by the time it reaches a report, the moment to act on it has passed.
Systems that do not talk
One building on one vendor's BMS, the next on another's, a third with nothing but standalone controllers — and a fire panel that talks to none of them. Each is right about its own equipment and blind to the rest, so the only place the estate exists as a whole is a spreadsheet.
Someone has to be looking
A front-end shows what is happening. Someone still has to notice it, judge whether it matters and act — which depends on who is on shift.
Alarms nobody trusts
Alerts arriving with no evidence attached, faster than anyone can triage them — so the ones that matter get lost in the ones that do not.
A gap before the fix
Monitoring in one product, maintenance in another. Every finding gets re-keyed by hand, and some of them quietly do not.
Six things, done properly, in one place.
Connect what exists, watch it live, detect what is going wrong, work out why, fix it, and prove it happened. Plenty of tools cover the first two. The value is in what happens after.
Connect
Meet every site where it is
Monitor
The estate on one screen
Detect
Alerts that arrive already diagnosed
Analyze
A verdict you can argue with
Act
One queue, SLAs attached
Prove
Evidence, not estimates
One screen. Every building. Every system.
A walkthrough of how the platform hangs together — portfolio overview, the Anomaly and FDD Agents, and a work order raised from the alarm that caused it. One product, not four stitched together.
Every device, in context.
A building is not a list of points. Plant, sensors, meters and life-safety devices each sit somewhere — on a floor, in a room, serving a space. Drag the model to look around, or pick a device to read it.
Interactive model with illustrative readings. Live deployments render the building's own geometry, with every value coming from the connected system.
Every operational decision is a spending decision.
Plant running into an empty building, a callout that could have been a planned visit, an asset replaced earlier than it needed to be — these are not operational problems that happen to cost money. They are the cost. Here is where the platform meets the bill, and by what mechanism.
- 01Energy
Consumption you did not intend
After-hours running, early starts, weekend operation and plant drifting off its efficiency curve. Each finding is quantified against your own baseline before anyone is asked to act on it.
Plant running into an empty buildingSchedule corrected and synced to the controller - 02Maintenance
The premium on an emergency
An unplanned callout carries overtime, expedited parts and often a second visit. Catching degradation while the asset is still running turns that into a task on a scheduled round.
Callout at 2am, overtime, expedited partA planned task on the next round - 03Capital
Capital deferred, not accelerated
Equipment run outside its envelope ages faster than the depreciation schedule assumes. Condition, runtime and accumulated cost per asset are tracked, so repair-or-replace stops being a judgement call.
Replaced on age and instinctReplaced on condition and evidence - 04Labour
One trip, not three
The work order carries the asset, the diagnosis, the history and the part. Fewer visits that end in a return journey for something that could have been known before the van left.
Attend, diagnose, return with the partDiagnosis and part travel with the order - 05Suppliers
Paying for what was actually done
Vendor invoices matched against the order and the goods receipt, SLA performance measured rather than asserted, and PM compliance evidenced per schedule before anything is signed off.
Invoice approved on trustMatched to order, receipt and SLA - 06Software
One platform, not two
No second licence for maintenance, no middleware between monitoring and work, no integration to keep alive. This one is structural rather than behavioural — it does not depend on anyone changing how they work.
Two licences and an integration projectOne subscription, nothing to join
Nobody has to lose their job for this to pay.
Headcount is the saving people expect. It is the smallest line on that list and the least dependable, because no software removes a salary — that takes a decision about a person, which somebody has to make. Where labour does improve it is hours redirected rather than people removed: the second trip for the right part that no longer has to happen. And where the constraint is finding skilled technicians rather than having too many, the same team simply covers more.
How the number gets established
We do not publish a savings percentage, because a figure from someone else’s estate is not a forecast for yours. A pilot baselines your sites first. After that, findings are measured against that baseline using IPMVP-style verification, weather-normalised where it matters — and you can see the workings behind every one.
One core. Tuned to the physics of each industry.
The same platform runs a building portfolio, a store fleet, a fire estate and a remote site network. What changes is what is measured and what counts as wrong.
Already live across the region's most demanding portfolios.
Where your money is hiding
A pilot baselines your estate first, then shows you where it is going — and what it is worth to get back. Connect what is already there, instrument the gaps, and judge the platform on your own data rather than a demo.